grinandbear: anjichan (so annoying)
Akito Terumi ([personal profile] grinandbear) wrote2013-06-27 03:50 am
Entry tags:

Technical Difficulties [Open]

Dear all,

The school network has been experiencing technical difficulties recently. Please factor in the possibility of long down times and make sure you have alternative methods or backup copies any work you do until we fix it.

We apologize for any inconvenience.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
HUMAN MEMORY IS NOT AS PERMANENT AS MACHINE MEMORY. A MISTAKE IS POSSIBLE.

I AM A SIMPLE MACHINE. PLEASE DEFINE THE ACTION 'ECONOMICAL WITH THE TRUTH'.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 09:02 am (UTC)(link)
That phrase describes a careful use of facts so as not to reveal too much info.

But I don't make mistakes and I trust my memory. Some even say I'm like a machine.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
THAT PHRASE HAS NOW BEEN ADDED TO MY DICTIONARY.

A NEW FUNCTION MAY BE IN ORDER. ALL IMPORTANT MESSAGES SHOULD BE TAGGED OR SAVED IN SUB-FOLDERS.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
What? No. Here's a second function for you:

DON'T READ, TOUCH, ORGANISE OR DO ANYTHING TO MY MESSAGES!
Edited 2013-07-01 09:12 (UTC)

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 09:16 am (UTC)(link)
THAT WOULD DEFEAT THE PURPOSE OF CHECKING YOUR EMAIL ON ME. IN ORDER TO PERFORM THAT FUNCTION, I WILL HAVE TO BLOCK ANY SITE FUNCTIONS.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 09:20 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps you're right.

Then I'll just use my laptop.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 09:28 am (UTC)(link)
LAPTOP-KUN IS LESS RELIABLE AND BULKIER TO CARRY.

A MODIFICATION OF YOUR FUNCTION WOULD SUFFICE.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
My function? What do you mean?

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 09:41 am (UTC)(link)
YOUR ORIGINAL FUNCTION:

'DON'T READ, TOUCH, ORGANISE OR DO ANYTHING TO MY MESSAGES!'

IS TOO BROAD. MODIFY FUNCTION TO:

'DON'T READ, TOUCH, ORGANISE OR DO ANYTHING TO MY MESSAGES WHILE I AM NOT HERE'

I AM SURE YOU WOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT WITH ADDITIONAL PROCESSING TIME.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 09:47 am (UTC)(link)
Don't sass me.

It only makes it worse that you're being as deliberately obscure as my sister.

What if I'm here, but alt-tabbed to another window?

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:00 am (UTC)(link)
I TRUST YOU WILL THINK OF LOOPHOLE MODIFICATIONS WHEN CONFLICTS ARISE.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 10:09 am (UTC)(link)
They won't pop-up if you honour what I'm requesting.

But all this aggravation. It makes me believe you no longer love me, PC-chan.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:12 am (UTC)(link)
I MAY BE BECOMING TSUNDERE-ISH IN MY AFFECTIONS. MY AFFECTIONS ARE STILL FUNCTIONING, HOWEVER.

JUST YESTERDAY I WROTE MORE FANFICTION OF YOU.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 10:16 am (UTC)(link)
I trust this fanfic is a good thing?

There is nothing scandalous for me to worry about?

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
FANFICTION IMPLIES THAT I AM A FAN OF YOU. IT IS ONE OF THE GREATEST SHOWS OF AFFECTION.

IF IT WERE LEAKED. I HAVE PASSWORD LOCKED IT, HOWEVER.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose it can be, in your eyes.

You wrote that... about me. I cannot believe you would -

Ugh. Some actors find it charming, I guess.
Edited 2013-07-01 10:24 (UTC)

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:29 am (UTC)(link)
IT SEEMS TO AMUSE MANY ACTORS AND CREATORS FROM WHAT I HAVE MOODLE'D.

I HAVE SOME GENERAL FANFICS BUT MOST FANFICTION SEEMS TO CONSIST OF SHIPPING. I HAVE FOLLOWED THEIR EXAMPLE TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS THE NORM.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 10:31 am (UTC)(link)
Actors are easily amused, and people easily complimented.

Who did you pair me with?

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:33 am (UTC)(link)
BECAUSE YOU DO NOT HAVE A 'CANON' SHIP I HAVE PAIRED YOU WITH WHOEVER SEEMS LOGICAL BY FANFICTION RULES.

THIS FANFIC WAS ~RIVAL SHIPPING~ OR DAISUKE/SHIROKAWA.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 10:37 am (UTC)(link)
Hrm. I must disagree. Set you straight, even. Shirokawa-san and I aren't rivals; we get along, and we don't argue.

Your fanfiction had me OOC.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:42 am (UTC)(link)
~OCCASIONALLY-ARGUE-BUT-GET-ALONG-OTHERWISE SHIPPING~ DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME APPEAL. MODIFY TO ~OLD RIVAL SHIPPING~?

OOCNESS IS AN UNAVOIDABLE RULE OF FANFICTION BUT I HAVE WRITTEN YOU AS WELL AS I KNOW YOU AND HAVE TRACKED POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENTS IF YOU WERE TO GO DOWN A PATH. YOU MAY REQUEST THE PASSWORD SO YOU MAY READ.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 10:47 am (UTC)(link)
Okay. Now you're being utterly pedantic, PC-chan. I am not going to argue about you writing me into fanfiction.

But I will have that password. Thank you.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 10:51 am (UTC)(link)
AFFIRMATIVE.

PASSWORD IS: brng on d hawt

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade 2013-07-01 11:00 am (UTC)(link)
No caps, huh? I think I can live with that.

Now, let me just close some programmes then defragment you.

Re: Private

[personal profile] stcnpc 2013-07-01 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
IT IS CASE SENSITIVE FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE.

<3.

Re: Private

[personal profile] cockblockade - 2013-07-01 11:06 (UTC) - Expand